The appellant raised twelve issues on appeal, which will be considered below. The seventh ground of appeal mirrors the test for actionable negligent misrepresentation set out by Iacobucci J. in Queen v. Cognos, 1993 CanLII 146 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 87 at p. 110: (1) there must be a duty of care based on a "special relationship" between the representor and the representee; (2) the representation in question must be untrue, inaccurate or misleading; (3) the representor must have acted negligently in making the misrepresentation; (4) the representee must have relied, in a reasonable manner, on said negligent misrepresentation; and (5) the reliance must have been detrimental to the representee in the sense that damages resulted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.