In other words, if the plaintiff succeeds in proving his or her claim, and the defendant succeeds in proving his or her defence of set-off, the defendant will be able to deduct the amount of its set-off up to the amount of the plaintiff’s award but not amounts in excess of the plaintiff’s award. This is in contrast to a counterclaim, which, because it is an independent cause of action, is “not governed by the same rules or subject to the same limitations” as a set-off (Beddall v. Maitland, [1879] 17 Ch. D. 174 at 178). […]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.