36 All that was relevant was notice of the renewal, not of the nature of the claim. See: Hope v. Hope (1854) 43 E.R. 534 (Ld. Chan.) where the issue was the validity of service effected under an order for substituted service. The Lord Chancellor observed, at p. 539: The object of all service is of course only to give notice to the party on whom it is made, so that he may be made aware of and be able to resist that which is sought against him; ...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.