In circumstances where errors in the instructions to the jury on the onus of proof are confusing, such that there is a serious risk the charge has left the jury with a misapprehension of the proper legal principles to apply in deciding proof, a substantial wrong arises and the appropriate remedy is a new trial. Senger v. Lachman, 2008 ONCA 323.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.