In Singh v. Singh[1] Mazza J. listed the criteria for the court’s consideration in exercising its discretion in ordering that property be subject to a security order. These criteria include the following: a) where a party has a history of dissipation of assets, that is, unable to handle money b) where the respondent is likely to leave the jurisdiction and become, in effect, an absconding debtor. c) where the respondent has, in the past, refused to honour a support obligation, whether it came by court order or contract or has refused to provide support at all. d) where the party has a poor employment history, or has indicated that he or she, will leave their employment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.