What is the cost of a summary trial for a motion of summary judgment?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Parsons v. Finch, 2003 BCCA 409 (CanLII):
In Scott v. Fulton, supra, Braidwood J.A. referred to what had been said in North Vancouver District v. Lunde and added that the expense of the summary trial would also be a relevant factor to be considered. In Scott v. Fulton, a full trial of all issues was ordered where further hearings would possibly be required regarding the particular issue in question and where another summary trial was set for hearing on a different issue.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
When there are two defendants in a motion for summary judgment against each other, does the court have any authority to grant summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a summary trial on a motion of summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a single issue is proposed for summary trial by way of summary trial, does the court have any consideration in deciding the issue as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a summary trial be held on an application for summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss a motion for summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a summary judgment or summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing a motion for summary judgment under the mootness doctrine? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the courts consider in deciding whether to grant summary trial rather than a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
