How have the courts interpreted s. 35.35(1) of the BC SPCA, s.35 of the Rules of Court, on an application to re-zone a residential development?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Putt v. Kunetsky, 2010 BCSC 394 (CanLII):
In Sargent v. Sandhorst, 2002 BCSC 107 at para. 22, the court found that because the city supported the rezoning of the premises and had already passed first and second reading of the bylaw and because the plaintiff had served the court application on all of the residents to whom the building scheme applied, it was unnecessary to require anything further pursuant to s. 35.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the BCSC interpreted Rule 14-1(9) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure regarding the exercise of discretion of the Court of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is Rule 31 of the Rules of Court applicable to a notice to admit proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted Rule 30(1) and Rule 7-6(1? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application under s. 18(1) of the BC's Rules of Court to prevent the habitual abuse of court processes? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with motions under Rule 34 and Rule 19(24)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 30 of the Rule 40A of the Rules of Civil Procedure on an application for a medical examination that comes three weeks before trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the rule of common law in the context of personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under Rule 30(1) of the Rules of Court, can an independent medical examination be ordered for the purposes of determining whether an individual is fit for purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
