What are the relevant considerations for a human rights tribunal case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Halliday v. Van Toen Innovations Incorporated, 2013 HRTO 583 (CanLII):
The non-exhaustive list of relevant considerations discussed in Sanford v. Koop, 2005 HRTO 53 (“Sanford v. Koop”) are: humiliation experienced by the applicant; hurt feelings; loss of self-respect, dignity, self-esteem, confidence; the experience of victimization and; the seriousness, frequency and duration of the offensive treatment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What factors will the Human Rights Tribunal consider defer consideration of an application before the Tribunal? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the Human Rights Tribunal defer consideration of an application? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an individual whose rights under the Criminal Code have not been infringed bring an application to the Human Rights Tribunal? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the Human Rights Tribunal defer consideration of an application? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any prejudice or prejudice against Respondent Respondent to the Applicant in the Human Rights Tribunal case? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the Human Rights Tribunal treated discrimination in the context of human dignity, feelings and self respect? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a prima facie case of discrimination in a human rights case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where an application has been successful in the social area of a human rights tribunal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of a delay in obtaining an order from the Human Rights Tribunal for a delay of more than a year? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the reasons the judge was right to isolate this aspect of the case for consideration? (Ontario, Canada)
