In Sachs v. Miklos, supra, at p. 40, Lord Goddard C.J. put the matter of consequential damages in this way: ... it seems to me that if he knew, or ought to have known, of this conversion in or about July, 1944, the damage which he now says that he has suffered owing to the rise in price is damage for which the defendants are not liable because it has not flowed from their act: it has flowed from his act.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.