It is the second principle above that is relevant to this case and upon which I rely to dispose of the claim based in the doctrine of Rylands v. Fletcher. In this case, there was no single disastrous escape. The waste here was piled up over years. While a single escape can be a nuisance, I have seen no authority that suggests that the Rylands v. Fletcher doctrine applied to a continuous nuisance, which is what happened here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.