In Rutledge v. R., 2004 FCA 88 (CanLII), Justice Létourneau restored the deemed dismissal of the respondent’s appeal and stated that: 19. No allegation of fraud was made by the respondent in the present case. She still lives with her husband. The respondent alleges her own mistake with respect to her husband's tax liability as the fact which led to the dismissal of her appeal. That was obviously not a fact arising after the judgment. Furthermore, it was not, in my view, a fact that could not have been discovered sooner with reasonable or due diligence: . . .
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.