In Roy-Bevington v. Rigden, the moving party was an access parent. As such, he had no ability to make an application to change the child’s name pursuant to s. 5(1.1) of the Change of Name Act. For various reasons, I varied the temporary custody order under the Children’s Law Reform Act and then dealt with the question of the mother’s consent under the Change of Name Act, which permitted the father to proceed with a name change application. However, to be clear, the material change analysis in that case related to the custody order.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.