In Rex v. White (1927) 20 Cr App R 61, it was held that: “On the trial of an allegation of being an habitual criminal, the interval between the last two convictions is only one of several elements to be considered by the jury; others are accused’s silence on his life during that interval, the nature of the crime, and the possession of housebreaking instruments and their number and character at the time of arrest.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.