How is the length of time between the last two convictions of a habitual criminal considered by the jury?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. McKenzie, 1960 CanLII 201 (SK CA):

In Rex v. White (1927) 20 Cr App R 61, it was held that: “On the trial of an allegation of being an habitual criminal, the interval between the last two convictions is only one of several elements to be considered by the jury; others are accused’s silence on his life during that interval, the nature of the crime, and the possession of housebreaking instruments and their number and character at the time of arrest.”

Other Questions


What is the standard for a jury charging a jury in a joint trial where out-of-court statements are tendered? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a jury to overturn a finding that a jury misapprehended or misunderstood the evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a jury consider the materiality of an insurance statement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Court considered the adequacy of the instruction to the jury as to the meaning of the offence of dangerous driving? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is contempt of an order registered under s. 13 of the Criminal Code of Canada a criminal or civil matter? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for changing a jury trial to a different jury trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the jury been instructed in a sexual assault trial to consider corroboration evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for reducing the verdict of a jury as to damages where there is no jury? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for an amendment by a magistrate to a criminal conviction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the principle of common law use in determining whether a person can be found guilty of a criminal offence under the Criminal Code? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.