What is sufficient compliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure to be considered sufficient compliance?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Rex v. Chin How and Chu Gockmen, 1912 CanLII 197 (SK QB):
This has already been held to be a sufficient compliance with this Rule, and I agree with that holding: Rex v. Harris (1906), 1906 CanLII 114 (NWT SC), 6 Terr. L.R. 376.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Rule 212(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to a claim of privilege where a document is withheld from production and inspection without objection? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to refuse to grant an amendment to the Rules of Civil Procedure or Rules of Appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to remove paragraph 6 of Rule 173 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the proper approach to Rule 38(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a personal guarantee action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an affidavit filed in breach of the requirements of the Rules of Civil Procedure requiring strict compliance? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the relevant section of the Criminal Procedure and Civil Procedure Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for allowing a motion to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to include costs? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the meaning of the words "substantially the same" in the English Rules of Civil Procedure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the principles that apply on the second ground of a claim under the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
