What is the test for a review order?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hykle v. Hykle, 2007 MBQB 243 (CanLII):
While review orders are not the norm they are useful and permissible in limited circumstances. As Binnie J.A. said in Leskun v. Leskun 2006 SCC 25; 34 R.F.L. (6th) 1 (S.C.C.) @ para. 37: Review orders, where justified by genuine and material uncertainty at the time of the original trial, permit parties to bring a motion to alter support awards without having to demonstrate a material change in circumstances.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for deferential approach by an appellate court in reviewing a family law support order? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the current order and what is the effect of the previous order? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge order a restraining order against a husband for a year? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of deference the court owes to a motion judge in reviewing an order of support? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a future review order? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeals from support orders? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review on an application for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on a motion to review a previous support order? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the context of a motion for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there authority for the proposition that at the time of a prior order was made, it was the correct order? (Manitoba, Canada)
