Reliance was also placed in Perren on the decision of Donald J.A. in Steward v. Berezan, 2007 BCCA 150, where he said that an inability to perform an occupation that is not a realistic alternative opportunity, does not constitute proof of a future loss. Approval was also given to the decision of Bauman J. (now C.J.) in Chang v. Feng, 2008 BCSC 49, where he said the court must first inquire into whether there is a substantial possibility of future income loss before the court embarks on assessing the loss under either the capital asset approach or the real possibility approach.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.