If the order is not clear or is ambiguous, the reasons for judgment are the “strongest indicator” of the objective meaning of the order: R v. Rajaratnam, 2019 BCCA 209 at paras. 155-156. However, as Mr. Justice Girouard stated in Canadian Pacific Railway: “[t]he reasons of judgment are mere opinions which may be considered as part of the judgment in so far as they disclose the grounds upon which it is rendered, but they cannot vary the text or dispositif of the formal judgment.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.