Reapportionment under s. 65 of the Family Relations Act is a discretionary matter. The trial judge’s decision is entitled to considerable deference. This court can only justifiably intervene if there has been a “demonstrated material error, a serious misapprehension of the evidence, or an error of law”: Karisik v. Chow, 2010 BCCA 548, at para 51.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.