What is the test for the doctrine of caveat emptor in real estate transactions?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cresswell Investments Ltd. v. Pavone, 2011 BCSC 1069 (CanLII):

Real estate transactions are generally subject to the doctrine of caveat emptor (“let the buyer beware”), which denies the purchaser a remedy for defects and deficiencies discovered in the property. However, as summarized by Ballance J. in Cardwell v. Perthen, 2006 BCSC 333 [Cardwell], aff’d 2007 BCCA 313, there are exceptions:

Other Questions


Is caveat emptor enforceable in real estate transactions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the doctrine of caveat emptor in real estate law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the doctrine of caveat emptor be displaced by express terms in a contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the doctrine of "caveat emptor” apply where the vendor fails to disclose dangerous latent defects? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the value of a parcel of land been determined in real estate law in the context of real estate transactions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party in a commercial real estate transaction aborts the closing of the transaction and forfeits the deposit? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a buyer in a real estate transaction? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the law on latent deficiencies in real estate transactions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for enforceability of a contract in real estate transactions? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the doctrine of non est factum be applied in real estate contracts where the contract is not binding? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.