The petitioner argues that to obtain a building permit, a person is required to sign a disclaimer indemnifying the RDCK from any responsibility and if they do not do so, the RDCK will not issue a building permit. He maintains s. 14.1 is unauthorized in law, illegal and unlawful pursuant to Kamloops v. Neilsen, 1984 CanLII 21 (SCC), [1984] 2 S.C.R. 2. He also refers to contract law.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.