What is the test for giving evidence in a criminal trial?

Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the test for admitting to giving evidence in a criminal trial? (British Columbia, Canada)

Can an appellate court "reconsider" evidence presented at trial when there is a reasoned belief that the trial judge must have forgotten or misconceived the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)

Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is a fresh evidence when a father applies to admit evidence that he did not have at the time of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the test on an application to adduce fresh evidence that existed at the time of trial but was not placed before the trial court? (British Columbia, Canada)

Is a trial judge bound to comment upon all the evidence at trial to support an expert testimony? (British Columbia, Canada)

Does a trial judge have to consider the evidence that supports a finding of criminal negligence in a dangerous driving case? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the difference between "new evidence" and “new evidence” at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)

Is there any case law where evidence giving a different account of events is irrelevant to the test under s.29 of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)