In R v. Silk, as here, the warrant was struck down. The evidence was excluded pursuant to s. 24(2). The lack of conformity to the Criminal Code provisions for the warrant was a factor (improper warrant), but also the lack of full and frank disclosure by the officer, and the evidence that someone at the hospital leaked the results. The court therefore found that the officer’s conduct bordered on wilful blindness and further found “quasi collusion” between the hospital and the police.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.