The arbitrary detention was brief and minimally intrusive. There was no search of the persons of the applicants. There was nothing that could be construed as demeaning to the personal dignity of the applicants apart from the detention itself. see, R v. Harrison at para. 30. The vehicle search was subject to a lower expectation of privacy.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.