When an application under R. 9-7 is made, does the applicant have to adduce all evidence?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from D.L.H. v. M.J.M., 2011 BCSC 1228 (CanLII):
When an application under R. 9-7 is made, the parties are obliged to take every reasonable step to put themselves in the best possible position and to adduce all evidence they believe is necessary for judgment: Harrison v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2010 BCCA 220 at para. 41, 4 B.C.L.R. (5th) 317, leave to appeal ref’d [2010] SCCA No. 293 [Harrison].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test on an application to adduce fresh evidence that existed at the time of trial but was not placed before the trial court? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application to re-open a trial to adduce fresh evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the statute requiring a judge to hear an application for a stay of an order made by the judge who made the order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application to adduce fresh evidence on an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What would have been required if an order was made before the application was made? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an interim support application, can the court get bogged down with the merits of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors to consider when an application is made to depart from section 3(1) of the Negligence Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
