However, qualified privilege is not absolute. It can be defeated if the plaintiff can show either: (a) that the dominant motive behind publishing the statement was actual or express malice (“malice in fact”); or (b) that the limits of the duty or interest giving rise to the privilege in the first place have been exceeded, in the sense that the statement went beyond what was germane and reasonably appropriate in the circumstances of the occasion. In other words, the statement went beyond the exigency of the occasion. See Atkinson at para. 46; and Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 at paras. 144-147 [Hill].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.