Is a Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Reviewable on the standard of reasonableness of a Public Prosecutions Reviewable?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Huynh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 148 (CanLII):

A PRRA decision is reviewable on the standard of reasonableness; see the decision in Korkmaz v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2015 FC 1124

Other Questions


Does the standard of correctness apply to a Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness appeal a decision made under section 131 of the Emergency Management Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In what circumstances will the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness bring a judicial review application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer (PRRA) not to be reviewed because it is considered "globally and as a whole"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision under the Public Prosecutions Reform Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to findings of fact by the Assistant Commissioner of Public Prosecutions? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for determining whether adequate reasons were provided to the Court for failing to provide adequate reasons? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for assessing irreparable harm to a family member’s ability to sue the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.