Turning to the first argument, that is to say that the petitioner improperly exercised an acceleration clause and in a manner contrary to s. 16 of the PPSA, I do not accept that proposition. After taking any reasonable interpretation of the aforementioned provision of the credit agreement, it cannot be said that it was an acceleration clause. The agreement is a demand loan. The same can be said of the promissory note wording. As said in CIBC v. Probe, 2003 BCSC 1224, a demand loan is an “at pleasure” loan. There is no requirement that there be a default of some condition.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.