Perhaps I should add here that, although the fraudulent acts of the husband occurred after the date of separation, this is not a bar to an unequal division of net family property. Contrary to earlier authority, it has now been held that post-separation conduct may engage s. 5(6): see Merklinger v. Merklinger supra, where the wife relied on post-separation events to meet the threshold of unconscionability under s. 5(6).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.