When parties ask a court to define the scope of an examination for discovery, the pleadings play a significant role in determining whether a question is relevant and material as defined in Rule 186.1. As Slatter J., as he then was, noted in Weatherill Estate v. Weatherill, 2003 ABQB 69, [2003] A.J. No. 88 at para 16: “In determining whether a document is relevant and material, the starting point is the pleadings.” The same is true of questions. The question in a multi-party action is which pleadings are used to determine what is relevant and material?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.