The judge ordered restitution in the form of constructive trust and disgorgement of profits, which are equitable remedies for unjust enrichment. “The principle of unjust enrichment lies at the heart of the constructive trust”: Pettkus v. Becker, 1980 CanLII 22 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 at 847. The elements required to make out a complete cause of action in unjust enrichment by subtraction include: “an enrichment [of the defendant], a corresponding deprivation [of the plaintiff] and absence of any juristic reason for the enrichment”: Pettkus at 848.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.