What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff is entitled to income loss?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Allen v Parkeh, 2018 BCSC 126 (CanLII):

The Plaintiff bears the burden of proving a real and substantial possibility of a future event leading to income loss. In Perren v. Lalari, 2010 BCCA 140, Garson J.A. said:

Other Questions


In a motor vehicle accident case, is a plaintiff entitled to an annual loss of income from his after tax income as a result of his personal expenses? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proof for a plaintiff in a claim for loss of future earnings due to loss of income due to climate change? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a plaintiff must prove that there is a substantial possibility of a future event leading to income loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff fails to prove quantification of their loss by earnings or by capital asset, is that loss quantification quantified or quantified? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff took steps that could have been taken to mitigate their loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that there is a real and substantial possibility of a future event leading to income loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that there is a real and substantial possibility of future income loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to prove that loss of future income is probable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove that there is a real and substantial possibility of a future event leading to an income loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff must prove a substantial probability of a future that will result in loss of income? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.