To return to the arbitration argument: The respondent submits Pelech v. Pelech, 1987 CanLII 57 (SCC), [1987] 1 S.C.R 801, 7 R.F.L. (3d) 225, [1987] 4 W.W.R. 481, 14 B.C.L.R. (2d) 145, 17 C.P.C. (2d) 1, 38 D.L.R. (4th) 641, 17 N.R. 81, requires the parties here to be bound to the arbitration process because this court may not override the support provisions of a valid and enforceable settlement agreement. In Pelech an agreement setting out a lump sum was incorporated into a divorce decree and the court held that, absent some causal connection between changed circumstances and the marriage, parties should be held to their agreement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.