As stated in Parton v. Parton, 2018 BCCA 273 at para. 43, “[t]he ‘means’ of a spouse include his or her capital base, employment income or earning capacity and any other available source of benefits or gains”. The fact that property has been allocated in the support-seeker’s favour does not defeat his or her entitlement to spousal support: Parton at para. 42. However, where property has been reapportioned in favour of the support-seeker, the quantum of support “is determined by the extent to which the reapportionment adequately compensates for the economic consequences of the marriage and its breakdown, including any claims for compensatory and non-compensatory support”: Parton at para. 42.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.