In this connection it may be noted that in Gould v. Hamilton (1855)., 5 Gr. 192, parol evidence was allowed to be given shewing that interest was intended to be paid on the balance of purchase-money, where the contract made no mention of interest. But that evidence was admitted so as to shew that it would have been inequitable to grant specific performance without interest, in face of an understanding that interest should be paid.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.