Sole custody, however, is not the only remaining option. A parallel parenting order must also be considered. In Baker-Warren v. Denault, supra, parallel parenting was defined at para. 26, which states as follows: 26 Courts have increasingly embraced the concept of parallel parenting in circumstances similar to the case at bar. A parallel parenting regime is a mechanism which can be employed where there is high parental conflict, and where a sole custody order is not in the child's best interests. A parallel parenting regime permits each parent to be primarily responsible for the care of the child and routine decision‑making during the period of time when the child is with him/her. Significant decision‑making can either be allocated between parents, or entrusted to one parent. Parallel parenting ensures that both parents play an active and fruitful role in the life of their child while removing sources of conflict through a structured and comprehensive parenting plan.
In Baker-Warren v. Denault, supra, the court also indicated that parallel parenting is a remedy which is properly reserved for those cases where neither sole custody, nor cooperative parenting meets the best interests of the child at para. 32.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.