An "overriding" error is an error that goes to the root of the challenged finding of fact such that the fact cannot safely stand in the face of that error. See: Schwartz v. Canada, 1996 CanLII 217 (SCC), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 254 at 281[5]. Where the challenged finding of fact is based on a constellation of findings, the conclusion that one or more of those findings is founded on a "palpable" error does not automatically mean that the error is also "overriding".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.