In Keewatin v. Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources), 2003 CanLII 43991, [2003] O.J. No. 2937, 66 O.R. (3d) 370 (Div. Ct.) Mr. Justice Then quashed an application for judicial review with leave to bring an action where the issues raised could only be properly and adequately adjudicated on the basis of evidence tendered at trial. More importantly, Mr. Justice Then found that essentially the ministerial decision questioned by the applicants could not be characterized as a statutory power of decision but rather was a question of constitutional validity of the legislation in question.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.