How have the Sparling principles been interpreted in the context of civil litigation?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Duncan Supermarket Ltd., 1982 CanLII 269 (BC SC):
The O’Grady v. Sparling principles were reiterated in Stephens v. The Queen (1960), 1960 CanLII 71 (SCC), 128 C.C.C. 21, 25 D.L.R. (2d) 296, [1960] S.C.R. 823.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can ICBC argue that s. 91 of the Insurance Code of Canada Act, s.91(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, or s.92 of the Act, be interpreted in the context of statutory interpretation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the principles of tortfeasor's law been interpreted in the context of the case law, and what are the principles with respect to animals generally? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the principles of a manufacturer been interpreted in the context of a boat case in which a boat was specifically manufactured to American standards? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the tort of civil conspiracy in the context of lightweight aggregate litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "corrosion" in the context of section 5 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for constitutional interpretation in the context of "interpretation"? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of equalization in the context of the Rules of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the writ of habeas corpus been interpreted in the context of a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the general principles of the BCSC in determining whether a will maker was a cause of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
