The applicable standard of review requires that great deference be shown for the trial judge’s assessment of non-pecuniary general damages. Absent an error of law or principle, a lack of material evidence or a misapprehension of critical evidence, an appellate court is not at liberty to vary the quantum of non-pecuniary general damages unless it is palpably incorrect or wholly erroneous (see Vincent v. Abu-Bakare, at para. 28).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.