If the passenger has “no right to interfere” and “practically no control,” there does not seem to be any legal obligation on his part to keep a look-out. No man is bound either for the establishment of his own claims or to avoid claims of third persons against him to use special precaution against merely possible want of care or skill on the part of other persons who are not his servants or under his authority or control [Pollock, Law of Torts, 11th ed., 481; Daniel v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. (1871) L.R. 5 H.L. 45, 40 L.J.CP. 121.]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.