The fact that there are no precedents for a finding that a breach of the “No Cash Rule” constitutes professional misconduct does not restrict this Panel. Such a finding can be made in a wide variety of circumstances. Whether conduct deserves discipline is a factual question to be decided by the member’s professional peers. “What may, in each particular circumstance, constitute professional misconduct ought not to be unduly restricted.” Stevens v. Law Society (Upper Canada) (1979), 55.O.R. (2d) 405 (Div. Ct.) at 410.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.