The plaintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the trial list is brought under r.48.11. The parties agree that to succeed on their motion, the plaintiffs must meet the two-part test set out in Nissar v. Toronto Transit Commission[3]. The two-part “Nissar” test is: i) that there is an acceptable explanation for the delay in the litigation; and ii) that if the action was allowed to proceed, the defendants would suffer no non-compensable prejudice. Is there an acceptable explanation for the delay in the litigation?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.