In Jacobsen v. Nike, supra the court found that the employer required employees to bring their cars to work, knew they would be driving home and nevertheless effectively encouraged them to drink without limit, and held at 388: Nikeˊs responsibility to the plaintiff went beyond watching for signs of impairment and taking steps to prevent him from driving if it observed any such signs. Its responsibility for his safety required that it not introduce into the workplace conditions that it was reasonably foreseeable put him at risk. It is hard to imagine a more obvious risk than introducing drinking and driving into the workplace.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.