I am not persuaded that these authorities are manifestly wrong within the meaning of Miller v. Canada (Attorney General), 2002 FCA 370, 220 D.L.R. (4th) 149. In terms of procedure, both motions and applications for a vexatious litigant order allow the party against whom a vexatious litigant order is sought to adduce all admissible evidence and make full submissions. Both motions and applications for a vexatious litigant order can be decided by a single judge. In both, the applicant may apply for more time to adduce evidence and make submissions if that is required. Thus, in all meaningful procedural aspects, motions for vexatious litigant orders are at least as fair as applications.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.