Can a motion judge apply a principle of law or a purely legal question?

Prince Edward Island, Canada


The following excerpt is from Havenlee Farms Inc. v HZPC Americas, 2017 PECA 20 (CanLII):

Of course, where the motion judge applies an incorrect principle of law, or errs with regard to a purely legal question, such as the elements that must be proved for the plaintiff to make out her cause of action, the decision will be reviewed on a correctness standard (Housen v. Nikolaisen, at para. 8).

Other Questions


Does the phrase “legally entitled to recover” apply to motor vehicle insurance policies? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge grant a summary judgment motion? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
If there are no common facts or legal issues of relatively sufficient importance to both proceedings, should the motion be dismissed? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
Can a motion judge reverse a finding of fact? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What are the principles governing a motion under Rule 21.01? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the legal test for judicial review of a judge's "unfettered exercise of his unfettered" power? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the test for a court of appeal to review the findings of a trial judge's determinations on questions of law? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
When a motion judge exercises her new fact-finding powers under Rule 20.04(2.04) and determines whether there is a genuine issue requiring trial, is it deference? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
When a motion judge exercises her new fact-finding powers under Rule 20.04(2.04) of the new summary judgment rule, is this a case of mixed fact and law? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What are the findings of a motion judge's reasons for judgment on costs? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.