A judge who exercises his or her discretion when the circumstances of the case are different than in other jurisprudence is not necessarily making a “conflicting decision.” A motion judge’s decision is entitled to deference. Therefore, in order to be successful on a motion for leave to appeal, it is necessary for the appellant to demonstrate that there is a difference in the principles chosen by the motion judge as a guide to the exercise of discretion, and not simply a different set of facts leading to a different conclusion (Nikore v. Proper, 2010 ONSC 2307 (CanLII) at para. 33, 101 O.R. (3d) 469 (Div. Ct.)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.