19. [19] In Borowski v. Canada, supra, Sopinka J. provided what has become in Canada, the classic analysis of the mootness doctrine and the approach to employ in deciding whether to hear a moot appeal. He described the underlying determination in deciding whether to hear a moot appeal at p. 13: In formulating guidelines for the exercise of discretion in departing from a usual practice, it is instructive to examine its underlying rationalia. To the extent that a particular foundation for the practice is either absent or its presence tenuous, the reason for its enforcement disappears or diminishes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.