Is a written agreement sufficient to cover all the issues that have not been settled in writing?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Fralic v. Drouin Estate, 2014 NSSC 344 (CanLII):
In Mitchell v. Mitchell, [1982] BCJ No. 1628, the issue was whether the oral agreement, reduced to writing, settled all of the issues between the parties. The court held that the agreement merged with the judgment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What grounds are sufficient to raise an arguable issue within the meaning of Article 4.03? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for upholding an agreement where the terms of the agreement are not clearly defined? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any difference between a written decision and written decision on interest and costs? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the rule against perpetuities apply to an option to purchase agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the issues raised by the Bank of Montreal under a guarantee? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for damages for breach of a rental to own agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the effect of a mobility issue in a divorce? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s litigation plan and certification order relevant to common issues? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a shareholder's agreement valid to change the president of a company? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting a settlement agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
