Although parties are entitled to “apply their own values and pursue their own objectives in reaching a settlement”, even an interim one, the import on this Motion of the foregoing acknowledgement is obvious. No two stage ‘Miglin’ analysis is required (Miglin v. Miglin 2003 SCC 24 (CanLII), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303), unlike, for example, in C.M.H. V. J.R.H. 2012 NBCA 71 (CanLII). Nor have the parties argued otherwise. III. Collateral Agreement(s)?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.