A Mareva injunction grants the plaintiff a far reaching remedy and causes financial upheaval to the defendant(s) by tying up assets indefinitely, before the plaintiff's claim has been determined on its merits. I recognize that a Mareva injunction should only be granted in exceptional and limited circumstances. See: Aetna Financial Services v. Feigelman, 1985 CanLII 55 (SCC), [1985] 1 SCR 2.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.